Rajeev Ram vs Illya Marchenko Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L L L L
Form
L L L L L L W W L LH2H: Ram 1 - 0 Marchenko
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ram winning 2 and Marchenko winning 1. The last match between Ram and Marchenko was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 17-02-2016, Second, Hard with Rajeev Ram getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rajeev Ram | 1 |
| Illya Marchenko | 0 |
| Ram | Stats | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (2-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 555 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 49 |
| 41 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 12 |
| 52% (427-388) | Career Total W/L | 57% (604-458) |
| $956,891 | Career Prize Money | $1,217,273 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Rajeev Ram
Player
Illya Marchenko
58%
(
73 of
126)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
4
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
8
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:32:38 | Average Match Time | 2:32:38 |
| 58% (73/126) | 1st Serve % | 55% (51/92) |
| 71% (52/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (39/51) |
| 47% (25/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 38% (35/92) | Return Points Win % | 39% (49/126) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rajeev Ram vs Illya Marchenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ram 1 - 0 Marchenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ram has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marchenko has won 40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ram, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marchenko has won 53.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 20.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ram has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marchenko has saved 52.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ram has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marchenko winning 27.27% (W/L 6/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ram has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 90/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 13/ 23). Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 138), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 85).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ram winning 1 times and Marchenko being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ram winning 2 and Marchenko winning 1. The last match between Ram and Marchenko was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 17-02-2016, Second, Hard with Rajeev Ram getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:32:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ram and Marchenko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ram winning 1 times and Marchenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ram winning 0, and Marchenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ram has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marchenko has played against players with an average rank of 289.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ram has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marchenko has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ram has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marchenko has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Rajeev Ram Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Rajeev Ram
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Rajeev Ram
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Rajeev Ram
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Rajeev Ram
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Reilly Opelka
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
8
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Rajeev Ram
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
21 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Rajeev Ram
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Mirza Basic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Stefan Kozlov
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Illya Marchenko
25%
(
2 of
8)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
6
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Joshua Charlton
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
18
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
1
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Illya Marchenko
51%
(
60 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
14
Aces
11
14
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
52%
(
30 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seongchan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ram vs Marchenko?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ram Vs Marchenko is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (427/388) | Win/Loss | 57% (604/458) |
| 52% (1009/932) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1422/1123) |
| 50% (9694/9521) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12836/11887) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 3216 | Aces Total | 4028 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1000 | Total Double Faults | 2969 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:14 |
| 604.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 549.8 |
| 63% (20063/32097) | 1st Serve % | 57% (34438/59903) |
| 74% (14814/20063) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (24897/34438) |
| 50% (6061/12040) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12818/25456) |
| 37% (942/2580) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (2330/5660) |
| 35% (11434/32352) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23028/59962) |
| 54% (417/779) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (570/1002) |
| 27% (7/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (23/47) |
| 52% (200/381) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (210/421) |
| 50% (140/278) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (172/369) |
| 82% (423/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (595/493) |
| 18% (423/75) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (595/102) |
| 20% (392/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (466/110) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
